本文共 3713 字,大约阅读时间需要 12 分钟。
We are tasked with identifying the differences between two Java classes designed to accumulate values and analyzing their thread safety aspects.
Let's examine the two implementations:
public class ShowMeTheDifference { // Problem 4: Identify the difference between the two programs and analyze them public static void main(String[] args) { final class Accumulator { private double result = 0.0D; public void addAll(double[] values) { for (double value : values) { result += value; } } } final class Accumulator2 { private double result = 0.0D; public void addAll(double[] values) { double sum = 0.0D; for (double value : values) { sum += value; } result += sum; } } }} public class ShowMeTheDifference { // Problem 4: Identify the difference between the two programs and analyze them public static void main(String[] args) { final class Accumulator { private double result = 0.0D; public void addAll(double[] values) { for (double value : values) { result += value; } } } final class Accumulator2 { private double result = 0.0D; public void addAll(double[] values) { double sum = 0.0D; for (double value : values) { sum += value; } result += sum; } } }} The primary distinction lies in how the intermediate results are handled within the addAll method.
In the first implementation, the result variable is directly incremented within the loop. This means that while one thread is updating result, another thread might access it before the update is complete. This can lead to visibility of incomplete or inconsistent intermediate values.
The second implementation introduces an intermediate sum variable. The loop calculates the total sum of the array first before updating the result. This ensures that only the final accumulated value is exposed to other threads, minimizing the risk of inconsistent states.
result is updated incrementally. In a multi-threaded environment, if one thread is halfway through updating result, another thread might see an intermediate value.result, the intermediate sum is never exposed to other threads. Only the final, consistent value is accessible.To enhance thread safety and reduce the risk of inconsistent states:
The second implementation is more thread-safe due to its reduced exposure of intermediate states. The first implementation, while functionally correct, is less robust in multi-threaded environments. Understanding these differences is crucial for designing thread-safe and efficient code.
转载地址:http://gzhfk.baihongyu.com/